Trump’s target has a name: Raúl Castro

Two Miami-bound planes were shot down over Cuba in 1996, and now the US is targeting the former leader, Fidel Castro’s brother.

 

On February 24, 1996, over the waters of the Florida Straits, the sea was clear and calm. Two small Cessna planes took off from Opa-locka Airport in Miami, heading south. On board were four members of the organization “Hermanos al Rescate”: Armando Alejandre Jr., Carlos Costa, Mario de la Peña and Pablo Morales. Shortly after three in the afternoon, two Cuban Air Force Mig-29 and Mig-23 fighter jets were grounded. Within minutes, two air-to-air missiles hit the planes, which crashed into the sea, causing the immediate loss of life of the four people on board.

PLANE CRASH

In Miami, the event is known simply as “the case,” the case that became the strongest symbol of the confrontation with the Cuban regime. Since then, it has become one of the most fierce and symbolic debates in relations between Cuba and the United States. With the return of Donald Trump to the White House, Marco Rubio to the State Department, and the Cuban crisis deepening to the point of collapse, the “Hermanos al Rescate” file has returned from the Cold War archives, being used also in discussions about the 94-year-old former leader Raúl Castro.

TWO VERSIONS OF THE EVENT

According to Washington, it was an illegal shooting down of two unarmed civilian aircraft in international waters. Investigations by the International Civil Aviation Organization, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, and several US agencies concluded that the Cessnas were shot down outside Cuban airspace. The United States stressed that there was no immediate military threat and that Cuba’s action constituted a clear violation of international law.

The Cuban government presented a completely different version. Havana stated that “Hermanos al Rescate” was not a purely humanitarian organization, but a hostile political group, linked to the anti-Castro exile in Miami and, according to it, also to the CIA. According to the Cuban authorities, the group had previously carried out repeated provocations, flying over Havana and dropping leaflets against Fidel Castro, violating the country’s sovereignty. According to Cuba’s version, on February 24, the planes were once again entering the island’s airspace.

Fidel Castro publicly defended the operation as an act of self-defense. Meanwhile, Raúl Castro, then Minister of the Revolutionary Armed Forces, was cited by the United States as one of the political and military leaders of the operation. Radio recordings released in subsequent years revealed the moment of the interception, in which communications between Cuban pilots and the order to open fire can be heard. Cuba has always insisted that the planes acted in defense of national territory, while the United States disputes this, saying that radar data proves that the planes were outside Cuban airspace.

CONSEQUENCES OF THE EVENT

The event had immediate political and diplomatic consequences. Just a few days later, President Bill Clinton signed the Helms-Burton Act, which tightened the embargo on Cuba and turned it into a permanent structure approved by the US Congress. Since then, the “Hermanos al Rescate” case has remained an open wound, especially for the Cuban-American community in Florida. In 2001, a federal court in Miami indicted two Cuban generals suspected of ordering the downing of the planes. Cuba dismissed the process as political. For many years, Raúl Castro’s name remained on the periphery of formal accusations, although it was constantly mentioned in political debates and in the demands of the victims’ families.

Now, nearly three decades later, the case has returned to the international spotlight. The decision to indict Raúl Castro comes at a time of deep tensions between Washington and Havana, amid new economic sanctions, a severe crisis on the island, and ongoing diplomatic clashes. For the United States, it is not just about closing a 1996 case, but about a precedent that is linked to broader geopolitical strategies. The case has also returned to political debates as part of a longer history of conflict between the two countries, keeping the “Hermanos al Rescate” issue still open on the international stage. 

Hot this week

Europe Beckons, but Corruption Keeps Pulling Ukraine Back

An article by Petra Kramer For more than a decade,...

The best European countries to invest in property in 2025

According to a new study by 1st Move International,...

Brussels, the New Vienna: Europe’s Headquarters is Infested with Espionage

An article by Yveta Cermakova and Edvard Vavra In the...

Power 25 for 2025: Who will impact EU policy this year?

As the new European Commission and Parliament sets off...

Five major economic hurdles Germany needs to overcome in 2025

Germany is set to face a tough 2025 with...

Related Articles